Publishing as a group, each writer under their own byline
Several people, one publication: a collective, a non-profit or a small newsroom.
Free to start, no card. You can export your posts at any time, on every plan.
Once several people write for the same site, someone has to decide who publishes, how a piece gets read before it goes out, and whose name it carries.
Without that, the site runs on one shared account: a password passed around by message, and every post signed with the site's name.
What you need
Each writer, their own account
You invite people by email address and give each one a role, which you can change later. Nobody shares a password, and removing someone ends their access while their posts stay online under their name.
Review before a piece goes out
An author sends a piece for review. A reviewer comments on passages without editing them, then the author or an editor publishes. If a passage gets rewritten, its notes move to a separate pile instead of disappearing.
Bylines that exist
Each author has a page on the site with a bio, links and every post they signed there. A contributor can send that page as a portfolio.
Ideas the whole team can see
Anyone can note an idea for a piece and share it with the team. A writer turns a shared idea into a draft of their own.
Several publications, one account
One account can belong to several workspaces, with a different role in each. Owning more than one takes a paid plan, and each workspace carries its own plan and invoices.
An archive that stays with the group
An admin can export the workspace at any time: posts in Markdown and JSON, plus the address of each image. A collective that splits up still leaves with its archive.
What Typoza does not do
Better to read it here than to find out after three posts. If one of these is a dealbreaker for you, do not sign up.
- Inviting anyone into the workspace takes a paid plan, and a large newsroom will need Studio, the only plan with no cap on members.
- No live co-editing. Two people typing in the same post at once do not see each other's changes, so agree on who holds the pen.
- One review stage and no shared editorial calendar: you schedule post by post.
- No forum or community space around the site. Discussion happens under each post, and readers have no accounts.
- No rights management and no contributor payouts. Contracts and fees between the collective and its writers stay outside the tool.
The post you keep putting off
Write its first paragraph today. The post stays a draft until you publish it, and no reader sees it before then.
Free to start, no card. You can export your posts at any time, on every plan.
The other use cases
- Keep a personal blog without maintaining a website
- Freelancers: show clients what you know before the first call
- The company blog, published by the people who write it
- Product updates and release notes, on a site of their own
- Your bylines, kept at an address you own
- A travel journal that outlasts the feed